X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B1FB67F.9070906@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:38:55 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: I want my FPE! References: <4AB29DDF DOT 301 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mark Geisert wrote: > Mark Geisert writes: >> I've tried many things [...] > > ...but I neglected the possibility of compiler expression optimization. I > replaced "1E200L * 1E200L" with "d * d" where d is initialized with 1E200L. > Voila, SIGFPE results and is trapped the way I wanted to. Ah, the old "Where did my delay loop go?" problem :-) > I'm still looking for a way to similarly handle integer overflow exceptions. Try -ftrapv. This is supposed to do what you want, but I'm not sure how much care and attention it gets, so you may discover bugginess. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple