X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B18F846.60300@cs.umass.edu> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:53:42 -0500 From: Eliot Moss User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Confusion re: use of rebaseall vs. rebase to relieve BitDefender woes References: <4B18A593 DOT 3020502 AT nc DOT rr DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4B18A593.3020502@nc.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Dear Ed -- I posted this a couple of days ago under another thread. Here is the rebase procedure that works for me: /bin/rebase -d -b 0x61000000 -o 0x20000 -v -T > rebase.out and /bin/peflags -d0 -v -T > peflags-d.out /bin/peflags -t0 -v -T > peflags-t.out Note particularly the base and -o values, and be sure the check the output. Also, you have to do all this under ash, etc., and build a list of files first with find (or just list particular directories' files). I found there ae one or two files I had to exclude because rebase halts on them. Best wishes -- Eliot Moss -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple