X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B15A6AF.4010108@cygwin.com> Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:28:47 -0500 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com >> Cygwin List" Subject: Re: [1.7] cygwin2 performance issue during compilation with autotools References: <4B158A2C DOT 20101 AT cryptelium DOT net> <4B1593C7 DOT 70301 AT cygwin DOT com> <4B15995F DOT 4020602 AT cryptelium DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4B15995F.4020602@cryptelium.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 12/01/2009 05:31 PM, kiorky wrote: > Larry Hall (Cygwin) a écrit : > >> Can we see *attached* cygcheck output for your 1.7 and 1.5 installs, as > 1.out -> cygwin > 2.out -> cygwin2 Thanks. Since cygcheck for 1.5 doesn't find gcc and you have tools from other sources installed, I have to ask, are you comparing Cygwin's 1.5 build tools with Cygwin's 1.7 build tools? -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple