X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:50:47 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Defunct processes with 1.5.25-15; seemingly reproducible Message-ID: <20091127005047.GD18148@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <5a05e0e60911261052w2e60586cxe7a90d02b4cf6e0f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5a05e0e60911261052w2e60586cxe7a90d02b4cf6e0f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Dave Steenburgh wrote: >It is my understanding that this problem is not easily reproducible. >Well, I've been reproducing it locally since last night. ?I'm going to >try leaving every cygwin-related process as-is as long as necessary, >in the hope of beating this problem into submission. > >The problem: > >$ ps >? ? ?PID ? ?PPID ? ?PGID ? ? WINPID ?TTY ?UID ? ?STIME COMMAND >... >? ? 4164 ? ?1288 ? ?7684 ? ? ? 5504 ? ?6 1003 23:49:20 >? ? 5392 ? ?3224 ? ?5984 ? ? ? 6100 ? ?5 1003 23:49:06 >? ? 1452 ? ?5240 ? ?5984 ? ? ? 8104 ? ?5 1003 23:49:06 >? ? 5240 ? ?3224 ? ?5984 ? ? ? 4532 ? ?5 1003 23:49:06 >... Defunct processes are not necessarily indicative of a cygwin problem. This could easily be a problem with gnuplot. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple