X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B0AA383.9000002@cornell.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:00:19 -0500 From: Ken Brown User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Problem with autoconf autodepend References: <4B09B81C DOT 5010806 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B09CA68 DOT 7080805 AT gmail DOT com> <4B09F60F DOT 40100 AT cornell DOT edu> <4B0A0407 DOT 5080006 AT gmail DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4B0A0407.5080006@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 11/22/2009 10:39 PM, Dave Korn wrote: > Ken Brown wrote: > >> I guess so. I wonder if there's a timing problem so that the deps >> directory isn't being created before it needs to be used. But here's >> something very strange: Angelo Graziosi, who is also playing with this, >> told me that he *doesn't* get error if he does 'make -j4', but he gets >> the same error I get with just plain 'make'. I would expect the >> opposite if it were a timing problem. > > No, that (potentially) makes perfect sense to me. There's a bug in the > makefile; it either has no or wrong dependency for the deps subdir, so it > doesn't get created until later in the dependency order than it is first > actually needed. If you run at -j4, some of the things later in the > dependency order get to happen earlier, including perhaps creating the deps > directory, but if you run it in serial dependency order at -j1 the deps dir > isn't created in time before it's first used. > > Can't say for sure whether or not that is what's actually happening, but > it's quite plausible. Thanks for the explanations, Dave. I was confused. There was indeed a missing dependency in the makefile, which they have now fixed. Ken -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple