X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:32:07 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] Updated: cygwin-1.7.0-65 Message-ID: <20091120103207.GR29173@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20091119094439 DOT GC29173 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20091120093210 DOT GQ29173 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091120093210.GQ29173@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Nov 20 10:32, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > That's annoying. I hate to say that in this case, but could you > please check for potential BLODAs per this list: > http://cygwin.com/1.7/faq/faq.using.html#faq.using.bloda > > And, for a start, can you please run the below testcase and paste the > output into your reply? If that wasn't clear, please send the output of the testcase *before* you start to eliminate potential BLODAs. Here's another thought. There's one piece of code which is deactivated in Cygwin 1.7, and which influences closing sockets. I reactivated that code (still works fine for me) and I would like you to test it as well. Can I send you an URL to a test DLL via private email? Thanks, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple