X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:35:54 +0530
Message-ID: <ff3ba4e90911192105t1841db69g4547a67330768c8f@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Cygwin 1.7 on win 2008 wierd behaviour with .sys files
From: Hrishikesh Date <hrishikesh DOT date AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I have a directory to rsync with a.sys.exe and a.sys in the same
fodler. rsync says it copied the file file a.sys to dest. But only
a.sys.exe appears on the other side.
I agree that foo and foo.exe should be treated the same way. But is
there a merit in using this assumption in context of cp or rsync as
well ?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple