X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:30:55 -0500
Message-ID: <ccc961b90911190930p7d0f8055kf12596c6a38f9324@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: GNU Prolog compiles without a hitch
From: Terrence Brannon <schemelab AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Gnu Prolog (http://www.gprolog.org) compiles flawlessly on Cygwin.

It is also ISO compliant.

Clearly there is less activity, support and extra libraries for Gnu
Prolog, but it is a solid product with fairly nice libraries and a
dedicated development team.

Would it be acceptable to create a Cygwin package of Gnu Prolog?  Or
is only one prolog allowed?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple