X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4B0194E2.2090203@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:07:30 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: subinacl not consistent with getfacl under ssh login (USERNAME=SYSTEM) References: <26355883 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <26366622 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <4B0114D6 DOT 4030703 AT gmail DOT com> <20091116085120 DOT GD3503 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <4B0117E3 DOT 5070308 AT gmail DOT com> <20091116163504 DOT GE20652 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> In-Reply-To: <20091116163504.GE20652@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:14:11AM +0000, Dave Korn wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Nov 16 09:01, Dave Korn wrote: >>>> aputerguy wrote: >>>> >>>>> So is 'subinacl' just another example of these badly behaved non-Cygwin >>>>> applications? >>>> Looks like it. >>>> >>>>> If so, is there anything one can do other than to use one of the other >>>>> methods to get a properly authenticated ssh login? >>>> You mean, apart from the other methods to get a properly authenticated ssh >>>> login, is there a method to get a properly authenticated ssh login? No, there >>>> is no method to get a properly authenticated ssh login, apart from the methods >>>> to get a properly authenticated ssh login. If you want a method to get a >>>> properly authenticated ssh login, I'm afraid you're completely stuck; you'll >>>> just have to use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login. >>> Sounds tricky... >> Yep. It might be easier to just use one of the methods to get an >> authenticated ssh login instead. > > Is that even possible though? > > cgf I don't know, he'll have to try it. If it doesn't work, at least there's always a workaround: use one of the methods to get an authenticated ssh login. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple