X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Rockefeller, Harry" <Harry DOT Rockefeller AT flightsafety DOT com>
To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 08:57:52 -0600
Subject: emacs 23.1.1 macro behavior and name completion
Message-ID: <3185EFAF9C8F7B4E9DBDF56829BF7C7807266E@srv060ex01.ssd.fsi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Emacs 23.1.1 (Cygwin 1.7) stores spaces literally inside emacs macros inste=
ad of using the space as a name completion command.  In the older emacs (Cy=
gwin 1.5) this is not the case.  The stored macro behaved exactly like the =
keystrokes were originally typed interactively.  Is this a "feature" of the=
 new emacs?  Does this emacs version do the same thing on a native Linux PC=
?  i.e., does this have anything to do with Cygwin itself?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple