X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26273372.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <26260606 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <416096c60911082351l7e3415e2s28f10549f3cf4136 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20091109120333 DOT GF26344 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <26269606 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20091109171803 DOT GK26344 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <26270509 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <20091109180913 DOT GA14129 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <26272067 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <26272231 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <26273372 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> From: "DePriest, Jason R." Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:21:33 +0000 Message-ID: <31b7d2790911091321y2f1b860fh79cd994f87d4f44c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Finding junction points in cygwin To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:46 PM, aputerguy <> wrote: > > More generally, could someone point me to a single source that can accura= tely > compare and contrast the following notions of "links" in cygwin/windoze: > > 1. Hard links (ln) > 2. Soft links (ln -s) > =A0 =A0- Old style > =A0 =A0- New style > 3. Windows shortcuts > 4. Junctions created by junction.exe > 5. Reparse points created by linkd.exe > 6. Other types of reparse points? > 5. Mount points created by cygwin mount > 6. Mount points created by mountvol > 7. Letter drives created by dosdev > 8. Letter drives created using Administrative Tools computer management > 9. Other types of mounting? > > I know that some of the above only work on files, some only on directorie= s, > some only on shares, etc. > but there is a lot of overlap and a nice table would be very helpful. > > Personally, I'm sure I don't understand all the differences, subtleties, > limitations, and when to use which one. I'm also left with the feeling th= at > Microsoft just keeps throwing new flavors of links and mounts rather than > going with a consistent approach but maybe I'm just biased to *nix. > > There is also the 'subst' command that lets you create a directory and point it to a drive. C:\>subst /? Associates a path with a drive letter. SUBST [drive1: [drive2:]path] SUBST drive1: /D drive1: Specifies a virtual drive to which you want to assign a pa= th. [drive2:]path Specifies a physical drive and path you want to assign to a virtual drive. /D Deletes a substituted (virtual) drive. Type SUBST with no parameters to display a list of current virtual drives. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple