X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AF50528.7030401@veritech.com> References: <4AF4E2FA DOT 8010202 AT veritech DOT com> <4AF4E4D2 DOT 1040103 AT monai DOT ca> <4AF50528 DOT 7030401 AT veritech DOT com> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:29:22 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 1.7: missing 'rand' command From: "Mark J. Reed" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Lee D. Rothstein wrote: > My bad. Thanks. Sorry. How silly of me to expect a rand(1) page to be for a > rand command. This is something of a quirk of the openssl doc, useful because you can in fact set up the openssl subcommands as standalone UNIX shell commands - e.g. "ln /usr/bin/openssl /usr/bin/rand" will create a "rand" exectuable that behaves just like "openssl rand". There's probably a 'make install' option in the openssl distro that does this for all or some subset of the subcommands. Anyway, this sort of man page quirk is not limited to openssl; it's always a good idea to check the SYNOPSIS to see if the man page foo(X) is actually for a command/function named "foo" or if there's something else going on. -- Mark J. Reed -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple