X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <26230850.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 10:21:36 -0800 (PST) From: aputerguy To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is there a fast way to get acl's for the whole filesystem (or chunk thereof) In-Reply-To: <20091106103419.GZ26344@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <26222793 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj AT 4ax DOT com> <4AF38812 DOT 4040309 AT gmail DOT com> <56i7f5lba7r55r24ug884qpehh66e2igpt AT 4ax DOT com> <20091106103419 DOT GZ26344 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Corinna Vinschen writes... > Cygwin provides the Solaris ACL API, not the POSIX ACL API, and the > getfacl/setfacl tools are designed after their Solaris counterparts > which don't have the -R option. Maybe this is a dumb or provocative question, but why does Cygwin provide the Solaris API rather than the POSIX one. Particularly, since Linux (and Fedora/RehHat in particular) seem to provide the POSIX one (or at least provide '-R' along with many other options)? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Is-there-a-fast-way-to-get-acl%27s-for-the-whole-filesystem-%28or-chunk-thereof%29-tp26222793p26230850.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple