X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Andrew Schulman Subject: Re: Is there a fast way to get acl's for the whole filesystem (or chunk thereof) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:58:42 -0500 Lines: 20 Message-ID: <56i7f5lba7r55r24ug884qpehh66e2igpt@4ax.com> References: <26222793 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj AT 4ax DOT com> <4AF38812 DOT 4040309 AT gmail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archive: encrypt X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Andrew Schulman wrote: > >> For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being > >> backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls. > >> > >> When I use something like: > >> find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile > >> > >> It is slow, in part at least because it has to fork a call to getfacl on > >> each file found. > >> Is there a faster way to do this (hopefully without having to go write > >> C-code)? > > > > getfacl -R? > > I think you're guessing. There's no -R option in the "getfacl --help" > output and it got rejected when I tried it just in case. Well, only partly. I was looking at getfacl on my Debian box at home, and it does have an -R option for recursive retrieval. Strange that Cygwin doesn't have it. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple