X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4AF38812.4040309@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 02:21:06 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Is there a fast way to get acl's for the whole filesystem (or chunk thereof) References: <26222793 DOT post AT talk DOT nabble DOT com> <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj AT 4ax DOT com> In-Reply-To: <6fv6f5dgkrgi6baa9ghfjaqp7h9a3eq9pj@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Andrew Schulman wrote: >> For backup, I am trying to dump a list of the acl's for the files being >> backed up since my backup program doesn't handle the acls. >> >> When I use something like: >> find /c -exec getfacl {} \; > mysavefile >> >> It is slow, in part at least because it has to fork a call to getfacl on >> each file found. >> Is there a faster way to do this (hopefully without having to go write >> C-code)? > > getfacl -R? I think you're guessing. There's no -R option in the "getfacl --help" output and it got rejected when I tried it just in case. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple