X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4AF2D091.4030508@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:18:09 +0000 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: malloc overrides References: <4AF29EC2 DOT 2050808 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4AF29EC2.2050808@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > ####### start code 1 ####### > > /* Are we stuck with standard malloc? */ > > extern void _exit (int); > extern char* strdup (const char*); static int are_we_stuck = 1; > > char* malloc(unsigned n) { are_we_stuck = 0; > return 0; > } > > int main(void) { > strdup("yo"); _exit (are_we_stuck); > } > > ####### end code 1 ####### FTFY. > ####### start code 2 ####### > > /* Is alloca is based on malloc()? */ > > #include > > void* malloc(unsigned int size) { > exit(0); > return 0; > } > > int main(void) { > alloca(10); > return 1; > } > > ####### end code 1 ####### Left as an exercise for the reader. cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple