X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:49:22 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Statistical anlysis of cygwin1.dll Message-ID: <20091104154922.GA2158@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4AF16DE9 DOT 4090000 AT cs DOT uni-bonn DOT de> <4AF19D4E DOT 9000001 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF19D4E.9000001@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 03:27:10PM +0000, Dave Korn wrote: >Thomas Werner wrote: >>i need to analyse the cygwin1.dlls assembler code for statistical >>purpose. but therefor i need to know which compiler is used and its >>version. every pe tool i used said "compiler unknown", so can anyone >>help me? >> >>if it's important. the file version i'm talking about is 1005.25.0.0. > >It is compiled by the version of gcc-4.3.4 currently shipping with the >cygwin distro. (Usually cross-compiled from linux rather than >natively, but the same compiler version is used.) Actually, I think it's likely that 1.5.25 was compiled with a gcc 3.4.4 cross-compiler. 4.3.4 wasn't even available when it was released. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple