X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:27:15 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] Undocumented change in accessing by dos drive letters? Message-ID: <20091102202715.GB6836@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <19183 DOT 9501 DOT 7117 DOT 656831 AT consult DOT pretender> <4AEF316F DOT 2070502 AT cygwin DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AEF316F.2070502@cygwin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Nov 2 14:22, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 11/02/2009 01:29 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > >I didn't see any documentation in the What's New/What's Changed > >document saying that the following no longer works: > > : > >For example: > > $ ls C: > > ls: cannot access C:: No such file or directory > > > >This had worked fine on earlier versions. > >This has broken several of my shell scripts so I am surprised it isn't > >either documented (if a desired change) or fixed (if a bug). > > I agree it's worth documenting. > > >Am I missing something? > > > >Note using C:\\ does work. > > C:/ also works. And /cygdrive/c, of course. What's the idea to use DOS paths in POSIX shell scripts? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple