X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:41:17 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Parallel downloading of Cygwin packages
Message-ID: <20091102184117.GA21484@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4AEAD9EE DOT 4010009 AT gamr7 DOT com>  <20091030125852 DOT GB1361 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <4AEBA0D2 DOT 5060001 AT gmail DOT com>  <hcm80g$4um$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>  <416096c60911020446x3e1cb001td775078fcf85e4be AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>  <4a89b8680911020914x4d63b4f1rf3897129d2df29ba AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4a89b8680911020914x4d63b4f1rf3897129d2df29ba@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:14:04AM -0600, paul DOT hermeneutic AT gmail DOT com wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 06:46, Andy Koppe <andy DOT koppe AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> *splutter*. You obviously haven't seen setup.exe's source code, and
>> you're forgetting that any such solution also needs to be integrated
>> into the UI, most interestingly, the progress screen, which is
>> currently designed for downloading one package at a time. Parallel
>> downloading would be nice to have, but it's nowhere near the top of
>> the list of potential setup.exe improvements.
>>
>> Meanwhile, you could always implement your scheme as a script that
>> downloads into a local directory and installs from there.
>
>It sounds like what some want is a bittorrent-like operation.
>
>Could a load balancer running on cygwin.com perform this distribution
>better than embedding the logic into setup.exe?

No.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple