X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
From: "Jon Beniston" <jon AT beniston DOT com>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: RE: Binary distribution and DLLs
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:59:46 -0000
Message-ID: <001901ca5bd5$7fb747c0$7f25d740$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

> Binary distribution?  You are aware that linking an 
> application against the Cygwin DLL requires to put your 
> application under a compatible Open Source license, aren't 
> you?  See http://cygwin.com/license.html

Yes, it already is GPLed and the source will be included. However, most
users do not want to compile things for themselves (at least in this
instance).

> I'm not sure he is and the user rights come first per the GPL. 
>  Not only that the application has to be put under an OSS 
> license, it's also required to distribute the Cygwin DLL
>  with sources, accoding to the GPL Section 3)

As I said in my original e-mail, I'm not planning to distribute cygwin1.dll.
This would be installed by Cygwin's setup.exe. 

My query is regarding other DLLs (which I have already said I would include
the source for, if I included the binary).

Cheers,
Jon





--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple