X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 12:10:01 -0500 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Cannot access Samba share; cannot rebuild cygwin1.dll Message-ID: <20091101171001.GA17133@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <96717 DOT 51096 DOT qm AT smtp102 DOT vzn DOT mail DOT re1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20091101151940 DOT GA16026 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <416096c60911010831l1bf57da9p70c12b4623293e5f AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <416096c60911010831l1bf57da9p70c12b4623293e5f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 04:31:04PM +0000, Andy Koppe wrote: >2009/11/1 Christopher Faylor: >> On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 01:32:19AM -0500, John Berger wrote: >>>First is the "function not implemented" problem that is plaguing >>>Samba users with Windows 7. ?? (I even upgraded to Samba 3.4.3 in the >>>unlikely event that it fixed the problem. ??No dice.) ??This issue was >>>already covered in another thread and mentioned a DLL that was >>>available to fix the problem. >>>[snip] >>>It would probably be good to make this link public as well. ??With >>>Windows 7 now out and multiple people experiencing this problem, the >>>fixed DLL should be made public with a very blatant warning about using it. >> >> The link *is* available. ??Go to the Cygwin web page and download Cygwin >> 1.7 which is talked about in the "Cygwin release 1.7 in BETA testing" >> section. > >I think John was referring to the Samba-related fix talked about here: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin AT cygwin DOT com/msg101874.html Or, more officially: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2009-10/threads.html#00439 So, a problem reported in mid-October is "plaguing" Samba users? The OP mentioned running 1.5.25 and didn't seem to understand that there was a newer version available. But, point taken. I generated a snapshot after Corinna checked in her multiple-cygwin-allowed change. Any other fixes will be available there too, of course. Quoting from the never-read-except-for-the-cygcheck-part of http://cygwin.com/problems.html As a rule of thumb, if you find yourself referring to your problem as *the* problem with XYZ rather than *a* problem with XYZ then your message is suspect. Using the in this context means that you are assuming that your problem is well known. Unless you can point to an email message thread or FAQ entry (either of which is a good idea, btw) please do not assume that the readers of your message will be familiar with your problem. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple