X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <51892.24214.qm@web25501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:38:59 +0000 (GMT) From: Marco Atzeri Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: lapack 3.2.1-1 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com In-Reply-To: <20091027080250.GA2076@calimero.vinschen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com --- Mar 27/10/09, Corinna Vinschen ha scritto: > On Oct 27 06:52, Fergus wrote: > >> New versions 3.2.1-1 of=20 > > > >> lapack (source) > >> liblapack0 > >> liblapack-devel > > > > I can see "source" above, but the lack of an > > install: > > line under @lapack in the current setup ini file for > [1.7] datestamp 1256597494 > > seems to lead to an installation error:=20 > > Can't open (null) for reading: No such file >=20 > I fixed that on sourceware.=A0 The (empty) > lapack-3.2.1-2.tar.bz2 > file was missing.=A0 I created one. >=20 >=20 > Corinna Thanks, I have not noticed its absence. Is eventually a bug of cygport that does no built the=20 empty file, or it should the setup.ini build procedure to advise for it ? Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple