X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AE281BC.1040200@cwilson.fastmail.fm> References: <4AE235E4 DOT 2060005 AT gmail DOT com> <84fc9c000910231559y194a9ccfyfb9414f8ed04a361 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4AE24BE4 DOT 8020207 AT gmail DOT com> <4AE281BC DOT 1040200 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 07:05:39 -0500 Message-ID: <4a89b8680910240505y73db7b6am9ef0b594e0aaaba2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: dg-error vs. i18n? From: paul DOT hermeneutic AT gmail DOT com To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 23:25, Charles Wilson wrote: > That's interesting. I had thought "ascii" was a fairly common encoding > name; I know I've seen both 'encoding=3D"ascii"' and 'encoding=3D"us-asci= i"' > in XML documents. =C2=A0Maybe we (cygwin) should add an explicit > plain-old-ascii encoding name? For XML, the list of encoding values is specified by IANA. http://www.iana.org/assignments/character-sets -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple