X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4ADE9823.2080209@yahoo.ca>
References: <4ADE9823 DOT 2080209 AT yahoo DOT ca>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:13:08 -0700
Message-ID: <2bbbac860910210113p7afa46bj52d5c0c1f08bf806@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Rsync link-dest not working for a host with the most recent  	rsync/cygwin 1.7
From: Chris Francy <francyci AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc: Steven Monai <smonaica AT yahoo DOT ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Steven Monai <smonaica AT yahoo DOT ca> wrote:
> Chris Francy wrote:
>
> I'm in a situation somewhat similar to yours. Up to now I have been
> using the current stable Cygwin (v1.5) to test rsync as a possible
> backup solution. I have a home-baked rsync/--link-dest script that
> ...
> limitations, but it would really suck if the --link-dest magic stopped
> working in v1.7.

I have learned that if I don't copy the permissions/ownership
information then the link-dest works fine.  I only used those options
in the past because older versions of rsync would not do link-dest
unless you copied ownership/permissions.

> Probably a dumb question, but: Are you 100% certain that
> 2009101420/tree/ and 2009101610/tree/ are on the same filesystem?

Yup, 100% certain.

> Could you post the contents of your rsync daemon's rsyncd.conf ? Are you
> using identical rsyncd.conf files in your 1.5 and 1.7 installations?

Yup, i am sure they are identical, and the config is very simple.

--- rsyncd.conf
use chroot = false
strict modes = false
hosts allow = 10.x.x.x
log file = rsyncd.log
pid file = rsyncd.pid

[data]
path = /cygdrive/d
read only = true
transfer logging = no
---

> Is --link-dest failing completely (i.e. no hardlinks created at all), or
> only partially (i.e. some unchanged files are hardlinked, while some are
> merely copied)? What version of rsync is running on the Debian box?

Absolutely nothing was getting linked together.

root AT linuxhost:$ rsync --version
rsync  version 3.0.3  protocol version 30
Copyright (C) 1996-2008 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and others.
Web site: http://rsync.samba.org/
Capabilities:
    64-bit files, 64-bit inums, 32-bit timestamps, 64-bit long ints,
    socketpairs, hardlinks, symlinks, IPv6, batchfiles, inplace,
    append, ACLs, xattrs, iconv, symtimes

Thanks,
Chris

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple