X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4ADA697F.5060408@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:03:59 -0400
From: Paul McFerrin <pmcferrin AT columbus DOT rr DOT com>
Reply-To: pmcferrin AT columbus DOT rr DOT com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Contents of /usr/share/man/man2 is empty
References: <4ADA430A DOT 8060209 AT columbus DOT rr DOT com> <416096c60910171551q681933c5ocd41ecee975e0384 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <4ADA55E1 DOT 2080000 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <4ADA55E1.2080000@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

I'm a retired programmer, disabled, and several strokes.   I find my use 
of man pages extremely useful.  More than usual.  Are you saying that 
Section 2 of the man pages really don't exist?  That's a shame.

I'm off looking for a more recent Unix version.

Dave Korn wrote:
> Andy Koppe wrote:
>   
>> 2009/10/17 Paul McFerrin:
>>     
>>> I noticed that /usr/share/man contains a "man2" sub-directory but it is
>>> empty.  Any particular reason?  I have Category Cygwin-doc installed for
>>> cygwin 1.7 but I am missing all man pages for Section 2 of the manual.
>>>       
>> Section 2 is system calls, which don't exist on Cygwin, because it's a
>> POSIX implementation on top of Win32 rather than an emulation of a
>> Unix kernel.
>>     
>
>   ... so the answer to the question, "Why is it there", would be that it's a
> superfluous hanger on, debris, an epiphenomenal artifact of some build process
> somewhere in some respect; i.e., best possible advice is "Don't worry about it
> nor waste time looking into it unless you care just to satisfy your
> intellectual curiosity."
>
>     cheers,
>       Dave
>
> --
> Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>
>   

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple