X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 17:55:38 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: gdb, insight, and tcltk Message-ID: <20091008215538.GA2272@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4ACD0C50 DOT 2010902 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4ACE3545 DOT 7070904 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <20091008212311 DOT GA2068 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20091008212520 DOT GC2068 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091008212520.GC2068@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:25:20PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I'm wondering if it would just be best for me to continue in this vein. > >"this vein" == continue to maintain insight and gdb. But before I do that I'm getting a ruling from the insight maintainer on where he sees the project going. I know he hasn't been comfortable with the way insight works with gdb for a while. But he doesn't really have backing from Red Hat to do anything about that so he's basically a one-man show. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple