X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4ACDCA99.9090400@cwilson.fastmail.fm> Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:18:49 -0400 From: Charles Wilson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Thread related crash Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com I'm getting some weird crashes with threads. When a thread exits, I'm getting a SEGV in _cygtls::remove. That is, when the thread function returns, it ends up in cygtls::call2 (e.g. at B, below). Oddly, if I set a break point at A, it is never hit... void _cygtls::call2 (DWORD (*func) (void *, void *), void *arg, void *buf) { init_thread (buf, func); <<< A >>> DWORD res = func (arg, buf); remove (INFINITE); <<< B >>> /* Don't call ExitThread on the main thread since we may have been dynamically loaded. */ if ((void *) func != (void *) dll_crt0_1 && (void *) func != (void *) dll_dllcrt0_1) ExitThread (res); } But the wierd thing is, once I "return" to ::call2, this = 0x0. That's very bad, and when remove() is called, it does: void _cygtls::remove (DWORD wait) { initialized = 0; where initialized is a member variable of _cygtls: that is, this->initialized. But this is 0x0. I have an idea why this is happening: I'm managing these threads manually using the windows API calls: CreateThread, WaitForSingleObject, SetEvent, etc. They are NOT actually started by cygwin's thread launching facilities (e.g. pthread). However, is it possible that cygwin is overzealously inserting the _cygtls::call2() function into the return frame stack? Does cygwin manipulate the TIB, even for threads created by direct calls to CreateThread? That is: CreateThread() goes thru a bunch of win32 functions, and then transfers control to the passed-in function pointer (the main thread function). But, when the main thread function returns, it does NOT go directly back to those w32 funs, but instead detours into _cygtls::call2. But, since _cygtls didn't actually create the thread -- *this is null. Any suggestions? (Other than an STC. I'll put one together after I get some sleep). This is coming up because any tcl app that I've built -- including insight -- always dies on exit, as tcl is shutting down its various utility threads. cgywin-1.7, debug build as of 20091007. -- Chuck -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple