X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:35:09 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Error in [1.7] involving  /netrel/src/cygwin-1.7.0-61/winsup/cygwin/mount.cc
Message-ID: <20091001143509.GB22046@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4AC4A597 DOT 60303 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AC4A597.60303@bonhard.uklinux.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:50:31PM +0100, Fergus wrote:
>Strange. I know you are not very interested in debugging user-specific 
>bespoke executables and I know that providing a test case would be 
>ideal, but an executable that has built and executed here successfully 
>under Cygwin [1.5] for the last nn years, fails in [1.7] with the message
>
>$ ./this_is_the_user_executable.exe
>assertion "root_idx != -1" failed: file 
>"/netrel/src/cygwin-1.7.0-61/winsup/cygwin/mount.cc", line 363, 
>function: void mount_info::init()
>Stack trace:
>Frame     Function  Args
>00229974  7713F003  (0000003C, 0000EA60, 00000000, 00229A98)
>00229988  7713EFB2  (0000003C, 0000EA60, 000000A4, 00229A7C)
>00229A98  610B9E93  (00000000, 0000003C, 00229AB8, 00000000)
>00229B78  610B6B27  (00000000, 00000000, 00000000, 00000000)
>00229BC8  610B6F3B  (00000348, 00229BF0, 00229C04, 00229C04)
>00229C88  610B7061  (00000348, 00000006, 00229CB8, 610B7105)
>00229C98  610B709C  (00000006, 0022CE88, 00229CB8, C98AA326)
>00229CB8  610B7105  (6115A054, 61191E44, 61191E54, 0000016B)
>00229CE8  6100109B  (61191E54, 0000016B, 611922AC, 61191E44)
>0022CD18  6107B57D  (60FD000C, 611D4798, 004E1E68, 6106E0E9)
>0022CD78  610B2090  (00000000, 0022CDB0, 610066F0, 7FFDF000)
>End of stack trace
>
>Crazy I know, but is there anything obviously wrong (or recently 
>changed) with mount.cc at your end? I'm using Windows 7 build 7600. 
>Thank you.

Wouldn't cygcheck output be a pretty obviously helpful thing to provide
here?

Heck, since we're talking about the mount table, even that would have
been a bare minimum.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple