X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4AC4BEE8.3040300@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:38:32 +0100
From: Dave Korn <dave DOT korn DOT cygwin AT googlemail DOT com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Error in [1.7] involving /netrel/src/cygwin-1.7.0-61/winsup/cygwin/mount.cc
References: <4AC4AADE DOT 4050401 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> <4AC4B592 DOT 9070409 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
In-Reply-To: <4AC4B592.9070409@bonhard.uklinux.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Fergus wrote:

> The executable is then co-located with cygwin1.dll and together the duo
> provide me with a portable application. (Actually a fast and elaborate
> stats package, amazingly compact with exe + cygwin1.dll ~ 3 MB, and
> fully operable on host machines a million miles from the nearest Cygwin
> installation.)
> Typically they reside at the root of a USB stick, but I noticed the
> reported failure on moving from [1.5] to [1.7]. If I move both files
> down one or more levels (and it doesn't matter what I name the
> subdirectory(ies) whether as \bin\ or \anything\else\) then everything
> works just fine.
> I'm sure you're right, that it's something to do with where cygwin1.dll
> [1.7] expects to find itself (cf. [1.5]) and the "cure" is similarly
> very suggestive of this. I'm dead happy to live with it once I
> understand it, if only approximately.

  Yes, it's absolutely certainly this.  We should probably add a fallback mode
that treats the same directory as the dll is found in as the root when it's
not possible to ascend one level, because I suspect this mode of distribution
won't turn out to be entirely unheard-of.

    cheers,
      DAveK



--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple