X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4AC4B592.9070409@bonhard.uklinux.net> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:58:42 +0100 From: Fergus User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin ML CC: Fergus Subject: Re: Error in [1.7] involving /netrel/src/cygwin-1.7.0-61/winsup/cygwin/mount.cc References: <4AC4AADE DOT 4050401 AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4AC4AADE.4050401@bonhard.uklinux.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > It ties in with what the assert is complaining about. > Are you launching this from a bash shell or from some win32 context like > cmd.exe? And is the exe itself a cygwin or win32 exe? And is it doing > anything tricky like trying to dynamically load the cygwin dll? Is the cygwin > dll that it is running against installed in the standard location or somewhere > else? It does sound likes something's up with the stage where it tries to > locate the root directory by assuming the cygwin dll lives in a "bin/" > subdirectory and ascending one level... OK, Poirot. The executable is built in Cygwin using the command "gcc -static .." and I run it outside Cygwin from a Command Prompt window. The -static switch actually works, in that it reduces the executable's dependencies from cygwin1.dll + several others, to cygwin1.dll alone. The executable is then co-located with cygwin1.dll and together the duo provide me with a portable application. (Actually a fast and elaborate stats package, amazingly compact with exe + cygwin1.dll ~ 3 MB, and fully operable on host machines a million miles from the nearest Cygwin installation.) Typically they reside at the root of a USB stick, but I noticed the reported failure on moving from [1.5] to [1.7]. If I move both files down one or more levels (and it doesn't matter what I name the subdirectory(ies) whether as \bin\ or \anything\else\) then everything works just fine. I'm sure you're right, that it's something to do with where cygwin1.dll [1.7] expects to find itself (cf. [1.5]) and the "cure" is similarly very suggestive of this. I'm dead happy to live with it once I understand it, if only approximately. Thank you very much indeed for your helpful insight, greatly appreciated. Fergus -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple