Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:07:52 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Four license questions that affect commercial use of Cygwin
Message-ID: <20090929150752.GC23361@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin-licensing AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4AC1D0E4 DOT 3030908 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>  <20090929094557 DOT GD7193 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <4AC1E226 DOT 10403 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>  <20090929103734 DOT GE7193 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <4AC1E749 DOT 6040504 AT cisra DOT canon DOT com DOT au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AC1E749.6040504@cisra.canon.com.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:54:01PM +1000, Luke Kendall wrote:
>I don't think you mean it is saying "you are not allowed to use Cygwin 
>within a company, Cygwin is only for personal or scientific 
>non-commercial research", and I'm happy that I can't see that. :-)

Cygwin is basically GPL-based.  How, exactly, would something like that
satisfy the terms of the GPL?  That would certainly limit your freedom
to use the software.

The main thrust of the non-Red Hat release of Cygwin is to make sure
that anyone who has the binaries can also get the source code.  That
shouldn't be as big a deal within a company as it is for a company which
attempts to sell Cygwin or Cygwin-based applications.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple