X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjYBADxPwUp5LETK/2dsb2JhbAAIkUm0SJBzhB4F Message-ID: <4AC1B44B.6080602@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:16:27 +1000 From: Chris Cormie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Num lines in dirs: C:\cygwin\bin = 1152 C:\cygwin-1.7\bin = 289 WHY SO FEW? References: <23428999 DOT 1253395327680 DOT JavaMail DOT ngmail AT webmail18 DOT arcor-online DOT net> <20090928220918 DOT GA14260 AT panix DOT com> <4AC17184 DOT 4020503 AT gmail DOT com> <4AC17C1E DOT 5020300 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: <4AC17C1E.5020300@cygwin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: > On 09/28/2009 10:31 PM, Chris Cormie wrote: >> I don't think you are doing anything wrong David. setup-1.7.exe appears >> to default to just the Base category packages. The 1.5 setup.exe selects >> many more packages outside the Base category by default and that's the >> difference you are seeing. > > There should be little difference in how 'setup.exe' works for 1.5 vs 1.7. > The determination for what's installed by default has not changed, though > the overall number of packages and size may have changed somewhat. On my machine the observed behaviour was different: new 1.5 install -> 91 packages new 1.7 install -> 44 packages Note that I'm not using a "clean" machine: this is a machine that has Cygwin on it before and one with 1.5 and 1.7 cohabiting. I wonder if anyone has installed 1.7 to to a clean machine? If the base install package count was closer to 91 it suggests the 1.7 install process is affected by a prior 1.5 install, that would be interesting. I hope I'm not confusing the issue. The impression I get is that David additionally expected to find packages he himself installed in 1.5 present in the new 1.7 install? >> As an aside I like this current behaviour: I have bandwidth constraints >> and problems with packages interfering with each other and so find it >> handy to start with a small core Cygwin and add the stuff I need. >> >> I don't know how to extract what the default packages are from the old >> setup.exe: I suspect it's all the Base category packages plus others >> from a list compiled into the binary though I'd be happy if someone >> could correct me on that. > > No, that's not true. See above. Could you explain how the installer chooses a default set of packages to install for a fresh Cygwin install? >> I notice that setup-1.7.exe has a command line interface with an option >> to select packages to install. It doesn't appear to be working yet. I >> sure hope it is a future feature because it would be just the ticket for >> this issue: compile a list of packages you want to be in your default >> install and then you could reproduce it at will. > > Can you be more specific about the problem you see? I was wrong, the command line interface *is* working for me. I was misled by the following apparently harmless error messages: in cmd shell: E:\home\admin\installers> setup-1.7.exe -D -L -s http://mirror.internode.on.net/ pub/cygwin/ -R e:\cygwin_1_7 -l E:\home\application_data\cygwin_1_7 -q -P joe E:\home\admin\installers>Starting cygwin install, version 2.649 io_stream_cygfile: fopen(/etc/setup/net-proxy-host) failed 2 No such file or dir ectory io_stream_cygfile: fopen(/etc/setup/net-proxy-port) failed 2 No such file or dir ectory io_stream_cygfile: fopen(/etc/setup/extrakeys) failed 2 No such file or director y ... proceeds to install package "joe" correctly Additionally I needed the the "-L" flag and was omitting it: Command Line Options: -D --download Download from internet -L --local-install Install from local directory -s --site Download site .... I wrong assumed I could omit -L if I was freshly downloading the package from the mirror and installing it in one go but this is not so: I needed to supply both -D *and* -L options. Chris -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple