X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:12:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200909281112.n8SBCea7005394@mail.bln1.bf.nsn-intra.net>
From: Thomas Wolff <towo AT towo DOT net>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: mailing list responses [Re: Console codepage setting via chcp?]
References: <20090923164812 DOT GG20981 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <200909251250 DOT n8PCoZo1018821 AT mail DOT bln1 DOT bf DOT nsn-intra DOT net>
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

[meta-response, irrelevant for topic discussion]


Corinna wrote:
> Any reason you redirected your reply to the cygwin list?  It doesn't
> make much sense to disuss this in two lists and it's breaking the
> threading on the cygwin-developers list for no apparent reason.
No, sorry, I had been cross-linked to the cygwin-developers archive 
from another mail on this list so I hadn't even noticed. And once you 
are on the web archive, you wouldn't easily touch the mail with your 
normal mailer to automatic construct a proper response, especially 
since I'm not subscribe to cygwin-developers, so I was pasting the 
wrong headers :(

Another note: Since I fail to receive the cygwin mailing list in my mailbox 
for some reason, I follow that on the web archive as well. I construct 
responses manually, using the available References headers; however, 
the web archive does not quote the Message-Id of the respective message 
itself, so the response will always be positioning one behind in the thread.
I'm sorry for this, too, but I think the web archive should be fixed to 
display also the Message-Id header of each message shown, please.


> Please resend your reply to the cygwin-developers list, into the
> right thread.
I'll post an updated response after I've studied the lots of messages 
that have been added meanwhile ... :)


Kind regards,
Thomas

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple