X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,EXECUTABLE_URI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4ABA53BE.2070107@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:58:38 -0400 From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090320 Remi/2.0.0.21-1.fc8.remi Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [1.7] "clear" missing? References: <4ABA506C DOT 5040408 AT cygwin DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 09/23/2009 12:52 PM, Gustavo Seabra wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) > wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ . Thanks. >> On 09/23/2009 12:40 PM, Gustavo Seabra wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I just finished a new install of cygwin-1.7. It seems to be working >>> fine now, but the "clear" command seems to be missing: >>> >>> $ clear >>> bash: clear: command not found >>> >>> Is this expected? Was I supposed to check some special package during >>> installation? >> >> >> > > Thanks, I can get it there. In case there's any confusion over the results of the above, I'm not recommending you _get_ the package from anywhere in particular. I'm showing you how to find the package a particular tool of interest is in. > But why is it necessary? Could it be a problem with the repository I used? It's possible. You'd have to look at your 'setup.log.full' to see if there were any clear problems with the install. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office 216 Dalton Rd. (508) 893-9889 - FAX Holliston, MA 01746 _____________________________________________________________________ A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple