X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4AB23F4C.1090600@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:53:16 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Vincent R." CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, Dave Korn Subject: Re: mingw question : Post repetita References: <4AA61819 DOT 4030501 AT tlinx DOT org> <4AB0A9CD DOT 3090201 AT lapo DOT it> <4AB0AEBC DOT 6090709 AT lapo DOT it> <4AB0D66D DOT 4000204 AT gmail DOT com> <4AB0E914 DOT 2060704 AT lapo DOT it> <4AB0EF6C DOT 70605 AT lapo DOT it> <4AB0F823 DOT 6010100 AT gmail DOT com> <4AB0F901 DOT 2090707 AT gmail DOT com> <4AB21248 DOT 4040609 AT gmail DOT com> <44e4e4b50fae19eef1a9a22c7f586235 AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> <8f87218e61e2bb0eb98853763c85cb9a AT mail DOT smartmobili DOT com> In-Reply-To: <8f87218e61e2bb0eb98853763c85cb9a@mail.smartmobili.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Vincent R. wrote: > I want to try to compile cegcc-4.4.0 (gcc targetting windows ce) with a > mingw compiler but I don't know which one to choose. > As always with open source software I can use : > > a) mingw(4.4.0) compiler from mingw project > b) mingw32(4.4.1) compiler from mingw64(maybe renamed in monika) project > c) mingw(3.4.4) from cygwin > > When choosing option c) how do you select mingw compiler ? I found some > old post but don't know if it's still valid. You need to make sure the compiler is invoked with "-mno-cygwin". And that gcc-3 is the default set in your alternatives configuration (which it should be unless you've manually changed it). > Do I need to pass some CFLAGS ? Well, that depends on how your makefile system works, but CFLAGS is the standard way to pass an option through to the compiler. However you may have problems using a compiler that old with recent code; hard to predict. > Dave, by the way when will it be possible to play with your > cygwin-mingw-4.3x compiler I'm running the final full testsuite. Started Monday evening, exploded horribly late last night somewhere in the fortran compiler tests, needs restarting from where it left off, will take several more days to run. Assuming the results are then good (they have all been so far), I'd update the README and upload it. I know I've said "coming soon" before, but a whole bunch of bugs cropped up that needed fixing. I think they're fixed now, but can't be certain until I finish the test cycle. > PS : I am posting again because I hijacked another thread. Sorry about > that. But it's no use replying-to your first hijack post to try and start a new thread, it just ended up in the same thread anyway! cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple