X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-ID: <4AB17DDF.3090904@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:07:59 +0100 From: Dave Korn User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: tcl/tk/expect/dejagnu/gdb/insight [Was: Re: [PATCH] Define _TIMEVAL_DEFINED consistently whenever defining timeval.] References: <4AADAF9C DOT 2000601 AT gmail DOT com> <4AAECE49 DOT 9040603 AT cwilson DOT fastmail DOT fm> <4AB16167 DOT 6070301 AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net> In-Reply-To: <4AB16167.6070301@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: >> which, honestly, isn't very much. I'd be concerned about all those >> tcl-db${old_version} packages -- but it looks like there are no >> in-distro users of them. That leaves gdb, ruby, python, git, and parrot >> -- all of which have active maintainers. Plus suite3270 and brltty, >> which I'm not sure about. > > I see no plausible way to transition other than a simultaneous release > of all these packages. Could we conceivably do coexistence by bringing in the new properly cygwinized versions at version 8.5 and keep the current 8.4 DLLs and /usr/share files around for backward compat? cheers, DaveK -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple