X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4AAE6CC5.2080202@alice.it>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 18:18:13 +0200
From: Angelo Graziosi <angelo DOT graziosi AT alice DOT it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Reading what should not!
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

Mark J. Reed wrote:
> Administrative users on Windows are
> treated as equivalent to root by Cygwin.

I know that.

> If you're saying that admin users should have to use sudo or
> equivalent to gain elevated access in Cygwin, then that's a feature
> request.  Does it match what Windows does?  Outside of UAC in Vista
> I'm unaware of Administrators having to do anything to activate their
> privileges.

I never said that.


Cheers,
Angelo.

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple