X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4318136D-5D7A-4DF2-B86D-6025B246DA7D@semanchuk.com> References: <1DC35497-BBA8-4F50-9DB3-3C5EFFCD17BD AT semanchuk DOT com> <20090913162218 DOT GA19315 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4318136D-5D7A-4DF2-B86D-6025B246DA7D AT semanchuk DOT com> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:15:17 +0100 Message-ID: <416096c60909131015v5e4b6021wffe114209827930d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7 message queues - permission denied error still exists From: Andy Koppe To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com 2009/9/13 Philip Semanchuk: > I also ran 'uname -srv' didn't contain anything > that looked like a relevant version number. uname -r normally does the job: $ uname -r 1.7.0(0.212/5/3) Unfortunately that doesn't contain the package release number used to differentiate the beta releases, which is why each beta release announcement contains this little tidbit: > FAQ: > ==== > > - Q: How do I know that I'm running Cygwin 1.7.0-61? > > A: The `uname -v' command prints "2009-09-11 01:25" Andy -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple