X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: One more time Subject: Re: [OT] Re: GNU screen hangs Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 11:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 46 Message-ID: References: <4A9C14BA DOT 8000905 AT cornell DOT edu> <4A9C394D DOT 8010201 AT cornell DOT edu> <20090831213625 DOT GB14033 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090831222750 DOT GC14033 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4A9CF7A1 DOT 8060704 AT googlemail DOT com> <4A9CFE1D DOT 9070601 AT googlemail DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-2 (Linux) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Ah, censorship. The Official Truth will become the Truth, when the opposition is censored. On 2009-09-01, Dave Korn wrote: > Nonsense, it's got nothing to do with the way you say it, it's the content > of your message that nobody likes: self-regarding vanity, arrogance and > me-first egotism. Unwarranted self-importance, much? You clearly read the messages through some anti-tuomov glasses, as most of the FOSS herd does. It's not like I'm liked much for pointing out where it's all heading, and my anti-distro licensing. So the herd attacks the message thanks to the messenger. > Spammers don't subscribe to mailing lists to harvest addresses. They scrape > them off the web archives. The headers are munged in the archives. The > bodies are not. You're just trying to justify lazy selfishness. Any sane archive will obfuscate both content and headers, if it all. This list is archived at http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/, and available by NNTP through news.gmage.org, both of which spammers can use. The former poorly obfuscates both (with @ replaced by ), the latter doesn't. Gmane can be configured to fully obsfuscate addresses, but nobody has done it for this list. And yet people carelessly post their real addresses in the headers... as if it's worth the effort of trying to keep addresses out of spammers' hands. Better stay of the 'net. No, the real reason for complaining about quoting an address has nothing to do with spam. You just wanted some excuse for attacking me with some nitpicky rules... on a list that is listed as the only place for users to report bugs, trying to help both the project and themselves. But, no, the attitude among FOSS developers these days is tha their project has no bugs, and they don't want to hear about it, so it's made extremely difficult to report them... registering on some suckzilla, subscribing on a mailing list (because apparently accessing through NNTP isn't really allowed, even when available), listening to power-blind assholes complain about some ridiculous directives hidden in some tome of Sacred Etiquette. Signing off. Pitäkää tunkkinne! -- Tuomo -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple