X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:55:38 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: fcntl bug Message-ID: <20090831005538.GH2068@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <4A8F0944 DOT 5020004 AT byu DOT net> <4A8F1819 DOT 9060209 AT sipxx DOT com> <4A8F19DC DOT 8060104 AT byu DOT net> <20090822001027 DOT GB8375 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4A9B1A3B DOT 9070600 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A9B1A3B.9070600@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 06:32:59PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >According to Eric Blake on 8/24/2009 9:15 AM: >>While we're at it, fcntl and dup2 both have another minor bug. POSIX >>states that fcntl(0,F_DUPFD,10000000) should fail with EINVAL (not >>EBADF) and the similar dup2(0,10000000) should fail with EBADF (not >>EMFILE). > >Ping. Cygwin is currently failing a test in coreutils' 7.5 testsuite >because of this. I have no intention of going to the effort of fixing these trivial problems. If it is important to you then please provide a patch. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple