X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "Michael Kairys" Subject: Re: BitDefender again Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:18:41 -0400 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <20090826013626 DOT GC9672 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <4A9521B7 DOT 2030806 AT gmail DOT com> <27ka95pcungltfpr67k9m9mcjdot5gmnjs AT 4ax DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <27ka95pcungltfpr67k9m9mcjdot5gmnjs@4ax.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > (3) http://www.f-prot.com Thanks for the suggestion... Seems some reviews give them low marks on detection rates: http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/RAP/RAP-quadrant-Feb-Aug09.jpg http://www.virus-centre.com/ ... and some low marks on features (19 out of 20): http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/index2.html ... but I hear that you are happy with them... I would in truth prefer to continue with BD at least until the subscription I paid for expires... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple