X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:35:12 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Howto get Cygwin<->Linux interoperability on NTFS filesystems (symbolic links issue) Message-ID: <20090826203512.GI4969@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20090826195958 DOT GH4969 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090826195958.GH4969@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Aug 26 21:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > It would be no big problem to support Interix > symlink R/O support as well. After all this time without Interix > symlink support, I don't think it's such a pressing problem, though. > I'll add it to my TODO list for the time after 1.7.1 has been released. Never mind. It was easier than I anticipated. I checked in a patch to support reading Interix symlinks. However, this only works as expected for relative symlinks, since absolute paths in Interix are different from absolute paths in Cygwin due to the different layout of the filesystem tree. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple