X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Message-ID: <4A8ED3E8.6030400@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:05:44 -0500
From: "Yaakov (Cygwin/X)" <yselkowitz AT users DOT sourceforge DOT net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.1) Gecko/20090715 Thunderbird/3.0b3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [1.7] perl updates
References: <6910a60908210134j715911c6r2da8793f145f59ef AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20090821084458 DOT GE32408 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <20090821084458.GE32408@calimero.vinschen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On 21/08/2009 03:44, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Erm... sorry, but why would you want to do this?  Either you have a
> 1.5 based installation running a 1.5 perl, or you have a 1.7 based
> installation running a 1.7 perl.  If you have two independent
> Cygwin trees, one 1.5 and one 1.7, then there won't be any collision
> either.  I really don't understand what that's good for.

A lot of unnecessary work on my end, perhaps?  I'm with you on this one; 
please do NOT do this.


Yaakov

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple