Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:12:48 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [1.7] IPv6 accept() fails if address_len is <  sizeof(sockaddr_in6)   [was Re: PATCH /usr/include/X11/Xtrans/Xtranssock.c    [WAS: Re: xhost   package not compiled for IPv6]]
Message-ID: <20090812161248.GF23876@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
References: <4A78A511 DOT 8020109 AT sipxx DOT com>  <4A803D7C DOT 6070800 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>  <4A825EE5 DOT 5020709 AT sipxx DOT com>  <4A82BB83 DOT 1090908 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>  <4A82C835 DOT 9030504 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>  <20090812135941 DOT GD13438 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <4A82DDC1 DOT 6050800 AT dronecode DOT org DOT uk>  <20090812153511 DOT GD14291 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090812153511.GD14291@calimero.vinschen.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:35:11PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>I have applied a patch to accept(), btw.  This should now work in the
>given scenario.  It occured to me that the returned value is incorrect
>for AF_UNIX/AF_LOCAL sockets, but that was always the case and it's not
>a regression.  Usually  the peer address of an AF_UNIX socket is not of
>interest anyway.  I added that to my TODO list and probably fix that in
>a later release.

A snapshot is coming soon.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple