X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:43:55 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: run-1.1.11-1 Message-ID: <20090812134355.GB13438@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <200908101812 DOT n7AICVXY019082 AT gridley DOT byu DOT edu> <4A8239BC DOT 8080401 AT byu DOT net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A8239BC.8080401@byu.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Aug 11 21:40, Eric Blake wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > According to Charles Wilson on 8/10/2009 11:51 AM: > > The run package provides a simple application to launch console programs > > with their console hidden. > > I'm now seeing urxvt-X consume 100% CPU when it is invoked via /bin/run on > a batch script. Reverting to run-1.1.10-1 fixes the CPU hogging. This > was on XP SP3 under cygwin 1.5; similar 100% CPU usage results for > run-1.1.11-10 under cygwin 1.7. I can confirm this. It only happens with urxvt-X for some reason. I don't see this for xterm, or xeyes, or xclock. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple