X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:17:40 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Cron jobs visible
Message-ID: <20090810211740.GB8165@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <h5ouf9$gl1$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>  <20090810113424 DOT GL3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <h5p308$tqu$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>  <20090810143854 DOT GQ3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <h5pi1r$iq3$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>  <20090810164444 DOT GW3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>  <4A806CE4 DOT 2000408 AT cygwin DOT com>  <20090810195841 DOT GA8165 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>  <4A807E12 DOT 4080009 AT bmts DOT com>  <4A808699 DOT 4060707 AT cygwin DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A808699.4060707@cygwin.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 04:44:09PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 08/10/2009 04:07 PM, Ralph Hempel wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 02:54:28PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>> On 08/10/2009 12:44 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> And there's no way back after an update. But as I noted in my zillion
>>>>> (apparently unread) test announcements, it's no problem to run 1.5 and
>>>>> 1.7 installations in separate directories side-by-side.
>>>> I don't know about anyone else, but I plan to run 1.5 and 1.7 together.
>>>> That will give me, effectively, Cygwin 3.2, which I can't wait to try
>>>> out! At least I think that's what Corinna's announcements said... ;-)
>>>
>>> Good point but I think Corinna's announcement said something about
>>> formatting my hard drive so I'm not even going to think about installing
>>> Cygwin 7.1 until I get a new computer.
>>
>> I just got a new computer - and it doesn't even have switches on the
>> front panel. I am so disappointed.
>
><interrupts frantic flipping of switches>
>
>What?  No switches on new computers?  What kind of progress is that?
>
>> Wait a minute - what's this about Cygwin 7.1? Is that the new version
>> for Windows 7?
>
>I think Chris is confused... or mean.  I get those two mixed up.  But I
>heard a rumor that MS is secretly using Cygwin 1.7 in Windows 7...

Actually, I meant Cgywin 1.7.  Sorry for the cornfusion.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple