X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BOTNET,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Message-id: <4A7BADFA.5030000@verizon.net> Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 21:30:50 -0700 From: Jerry DeLisle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090513 Fedora/3.0-2.3.beta2.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: mintty doesn't run on NT4 due to lack of GetConsoleWindow References: <20090806044706 DOT GA2009 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <416096c60908060418p70329409q751c2a3735167998 AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D44C0E1 AT DF-M14-04 DOT exchange DOT corp DOT microsoft DOT com> In-reply-to: <450B91BCB17B4346BD55B6FE9215AFFF1D44C0E1@DF-M14-04.exchange.corp.microsoft.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On 08/06/2009 08:02 AM, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Andy Koppe wrote: > " (And to be honest I don't see the point in Cygwin 1.7 still supporting > " NT4. Anyone willing to stick with an OS that's been unsupported for > " five years should be more than happy to stick with Cygwin 1.5.) > > Agreed, it seems a bit inconsistent, and yet I can think of at least two > reasons a user might want an old Windows and a new Cygwin: > - user is aiming for as Unixy an experience as possible with minimal > Windows interaction, hence always wants latest and greatest Cygwin > and hopes never to disturb the Windows OS underneath. > - user is happy to upgrade Cygwin because of the price, but would > rather not upgrade Windows, because of the price. > > stephan(); > > I use NT4 because it is reliable, responsive, and available (I have it already). I use it to test patches for gfortran under Cygwin 1.7. I figure if it works under NT4 with basic win32 features it is a safe bet it will work elsewhere. Maybe I am wrong, but it works for me. I run in VirtualBox on Linux (Linux being my preferred real OS) I provide binaries of gfortran (latest trunk) for Cygwin users as a courtesy and to enable as broad a testing base as I can get for this Gnu software. I wish I could encourage more people to just move to Linux, but I am not unrealistic about that. Regards, Jerry -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple