X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:09:15 -0400 From: Christopher Faylor To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please test the latest snapshot! Message-ID: <20090806180914.GB3939@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <20090804180042 DOT GC5001 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090804223616 DOT GA9686 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090806163734 DOT GJ3204 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20090806164531 DOT GC3375 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090806170402 DOT GA3844 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090806180142 DOT GA19829 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090806180142.GA19829@calimero.vinschen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 08:01:42PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Aug 6 13:04, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 12:45:31PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>I was, until yesterday, using the McAffee virus checker. I'll try it >>>again with that turned off. > >IIRC from reports on this list, it might not be sufficient to disable >it, rather you would have to deinstall it. There's probably some >serious Windows DLL hooking going on. I NUKED the sucker yesterday. It took me the better part of an hour to remove all remnants of it since the uninstall was persnickity. I wanted to get the system down to bare bones and I think I succeeded. FWIW, I also had webex running on it which I can imagine would also cause problems. >>If I set the buffer size up to 65536 it still fails. If I set it down >>it still succeeds. FWIW, my previous tests were with Windows XP SP2. >>Given that Eric is still reporting problems, I guess it could still be >>BLODA though. > >Is there a chance this is a XP problem which has been fixed with XP >SP3? Additionally to XP SP3, 2008, and Windows 7, I now tried with >Windows 2000 and it still works for me. Sorry. What I meant to say was that I upgraded to SP3 after first trying SP2 and it failed in both cases. I don't know why it would matter but this is a virtual machine running under VirtualBox. I guess it is barely possible that the VirtualBox add-ons could cause a problem. Also, grasping at straws, I wonder if it could be related to the ethernet card being used. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple