X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 18:37:34 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Please test the latest snapshot! Message-ID: <20090806163734.GJ3204@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net> <20090804180042 DOT GC5001 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> <20090804223616 DOT GA9686 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090804223616.GA9686@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-02-20) Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com On Aug 4 18:36, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:00:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:30:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote: > >>> I'm still seeing some weird stuff in the latest snapshot. This is > >>> a fresh install, with nothing other than the Base category + git, > >>> and substituting just cygwin1.dll. > >>> > >>> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libsigsegv.git > >>> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/eblake/libsigsegv/.git/ > >>> fatal: write error (Socket operation on non-socket) > >> > >>I'm seeing this behavior even as far back as snapshot 20090706, so it > >>may be some BLODA on this particular machine, rather than a new > >>failure in the latest snapshot. Other than this weird behavior of > >>git, I haven't seen anything else misbehave with the 20090804 snapshot. > > > >Does that mean you don't see the problem with the 20090704 snapshot or > >that you haven't tested that far back? > > > >I'll try this command out as soon as I can. > > I tried it and it failed as you indicated. > > The next snapshot should fix the problem. FWIW, if I change the send/recv buffer sizes back to 65536 in fdsock, it still works for me, every time I try it. I tried on XP SP3, Server 2008, and Windows 7. Is it possible that this is actually a BLODA problem? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple