X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:36:16 -0400
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Please test the latest snapshot!
Message-ID: <20090804223616.GA9686@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <347438636 DOT 8310991249398331327 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net>  <1103417648 DOT 8356341249403449340 DOT JavaMail DOT root AT sz0059a DOT emeryville DOT ca DOT mail DOT comcast DOT net>  <20090804180042 DOT GC5001 AT ednor DOT casa DOT cgf DOT cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090804180042.GC5001@ednor.casa.cgf.cx>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cygwin-unsubscribe-archive-cygwin=delorie DOT com AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:00:42PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:30:49PM +0000, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> I'm still seeing some weird stuff in the latest snapshot.  This is
>>> a fresh install, with nothing other than the Base category + git,
>>> and substituting just cygwin1.dll.
>>> 
>>> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/libsigsegv.git
>>> Initialized empty Git repository in /home/eblake/libsigsegv/.git/
>>> fatal: write error (Socket operation on non-socket)
>>
>>I'm seeing this behavior even as far back as snapshot 20090706, so it
>>may be some BLODA on this particular machine, rather than a new
>>failure in the latest snapshot.  Other than this weird behavior of
>>git, I haven't seen anything else misbehave with the 20090804 snapshot.
>
>Does that mean you don't see the problem with the 20090704 snapshot or
>that you haven't tested that far back?
>
>I'll try this command out as soon as I can.

I tried it and it failed as you indicated.

The next snapshot should fix the problem.

cgf

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple